Laws could have been Committed, as was the offender not at the time of imprisonment under British rule. He added, "that he had only in his former letter dwelt on the voluntary surrender of the man to show that the man made his appearance on his own accord, and that no forcible means were employed to secure his person, and therefore British Laws were not infringed." He continued, "and to prove that the man acted on his own impulses and free from restraint while under the sole control and protection of British authority until the moment he set his foot on the 'Albe' or 'hilbe', when such protection necessarily and at once ceased, because there Prussian Authority commenced, and this cancelled the pretended rights of third parties."
Page 252
1/2
"Laws could have been
H
#
"
Committed, as
was
the offender not at the time of imprisonment under Mitish rule -_ He added, " that he had only in his
former letter deelt on the
voluntary surrender
斥
the
man to show that contil
man made his
the
"Albe"
мо
appearance on
were
bound the
means
forcible employed to secure person, and therefore "British Laws not infringed
his
252
" against", and to prove that
the
the man
man acted
nated on
his
own impulses and free
"from restraint while mon
the sole control and
"protection
of British "authority until the momente
he set his foot
По
bound
the "hilbe" when such
"protection necessarily and "at once ceased, because there Prussian Authority commenced, and this cancelled the pretended third parties! -
#
rights of
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.